Boeing Revamps Production Facility for Starliner Flights

Starliner_in_space
By Steven Siceloff,
NASA’s Kennedy Space Center, Fla.

Meet the CST-100 Starliner, the newly unveiled name of Boeing’s commercial crew transportation spacecraft. It’s been designed with a focus on automated flight, reliable operation and frequent flights carrying NASA astronauts to the space station. It also may take paying customers to the awe-inspiring heights of low-Earth orbit and the unique sensation of sustained weightlessness.

NASA last year awarded contracts to Boeing and SpaceX to each develop systems that will safely and cost effectively transport astronauts to the International Space Station from the United States.

The CST-100 will be assembled and processed for launch at the revitalized Commercial Crew and Cargo Processing Facility, or C3PF, at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. NASA had used the facility for 20 years as a shuttle processing hangar and for the extensive preps and testing of the space shuttle main engines in the engine shop.

“One hundred years ago we were on the dawn of the commercial aviation era and today, with the help of NASA, we’re on the dawn of a new commercial space era,” said Boeing’s John Elbon, vice president and general manager of Space Exploration. “It’s been such a pleasure to work hand-in-hand with NASA on this commercial crew development, and when we look back 100 years from this point, I’m really excited about what we will have discovered.”

With the high bay of the C3PF expected to be complete in December 2015, engineers are building the structural test article for the Starliner in the remodeled engine shop. Though not scheduled to ever make it into space, the test version of the spacecraft will be put through a continuum of tests culminating with a pad abort test in 2017. It will be used as a pathfinder to prove the design Boeing and NASA’s Commercial Crew Program worked together to develop is sound and can accomplish its missions.

Parts of the Boeing CST-100 Structural Test Article rest on test stands inside the Commercial Crew and Cargo Processing Facility, or C3PF, at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The test article will serve as a pathfinder for assembling and processing operational CST-100 spacecraft inside the revitalized facility, which for 20 years served as a shuttle processing hangar. (Cedit: NASA/Kim Shiflett)
Parts of the Boeing CST-100 Structural Test Article rest on test stands inside the Commercial Crew and Cargo Processing Facility, or C3PF, at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The test article will serve as a pathfinder for assembling and processing operational CST-100 spacecraft inside the revitalized facility, which for 20 years served as a shuttle processing hangar. (Cedit: NASA/Kim Shiflett)

For NASA, the main mission for Boeing’s Starliner and the SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft is to re-establish an American launch capability for astronauts to use to reach the space station and make more use of its unique research environment. Experiments are conducted every day in orbit that will improve life on Earth and find answers to the challenges of deep space exploration so astronauts can undertake a successful journey to Mars in the future.

“Commercial crew is an essential component of our journey to Mars, and in 35 states, 350 American companies are working to make it possible for the greatest country on Earth to once again launch our own astronauts into space,” said NASA Administrator Charles Bolden. “That’s some impressive investment.”

NASA expects to use the Starliner and Crew Dragon to take four crew members to the space station at a time, increasing the resident crew on the orbiting laboratory to seven at a time instead of the current six. By adding the workweek of a single new crew member to the capabilities of the space station, the amount of research time available to astronauts in orbit will double to about 80 hours a week.

Kennedy will be the home of Boeing’s Commercial Crew Program, with other buildings at the center to be used as Boeing’s Launch Control Center and for mission support.

“Kennedy Space Center has transitioned more than 50 facilities for commercial use. We have made improvements and upgrades to well-known Kennedy workhorses such as the Vehicle Assembly Building, mobile launcher, crawler–transporter and Launch Pad 39B in support of Orion, the SLS and Advanced Exploration Systems,” said Robert Cabana, Kennedy’s center director. “I am proud of our success in transforming Kennedy Space Center to a 21st century, multi-user spaceport that is now capable of supporting the launch of all sizes and classes of vehicles, including horizontal launches from the Shuttle Landing Facility, and spacecraft processing and landing.”

Boeing officials say Kennedy was a natural choice given its expertise along the full range of spacecraft and rocket processing to launch and operations.

“When Boeing was looking for the prime location for its program headquarters, we knew Florida had a lot to offer from the infrastructure to the supplier base to the skilled work force,” said Chris Ferguson, a former shuttle commander who now is deputy manager of operations for Boeing’s Commercial Crew Program.

The Starliner will launch from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station’s Space Launch Complex-41 on a United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V rocket. The crew access tower that will support astronauts and ground support teams before launch is being built a couple of miles away from the launch pad now and will be assembled adjacent to the current structures already at the pad. ULA will continue to operate the pad for Atlas V processing and launches during construction of the tower.

Although the infrastructure is coming together quickly, the first flight of the Starliner and Crew Dragon depends on a number of design and testing milestones for the entire space system before either one will be in a position to take its first flight test.

Working under contracts awarded last year, both Boeing and SpaceX agreed to conduct an orbital mission without a crew aboard for their respective spacecraft. Then each will launch a test flight, which includes astronauts, to demonstrate the spacecraft’s ability to meet the demands of human-rated spaceflight. Following that mission, the spacecraft will be certified for operational missions carrying a full complement of crew to support the research work on the space station. And astronauts will once again will be taking regular flights from Florida’s Space Coast.

  • Yeah, they’re integrated with the capsule itself and not part a 20 or 30 foot tall Launch Abort Tower. Same with Starliner.

    Not that a LAT is evil, it worked great for Mercury and Apollo, Soyuz (even saved some cosmonauts) and Shenzhou. I’m sure it’ll work great on Orion too. But it’s a lot of weight that you take nearly to orbit and then never see again.

  • Hug Doug

    Well, the Mars One habitats are intended to be inflatable and buried under a couple meters of dirt for insulation and radiation protection. I don’t think you’d want a greenhouse on the surface without any shielding from radiation.

  • windbourne

    Yup. I am living that fantasy, along with the likes of Elon Musk, Buzz Aldrin, Stephen Hawkings, Charlie Bolden, etc.
    All of us are in a fantasy world since you have declared that.
    And I was correct on my original statement. You are the type that hates it when you do not get things your way so just keep up with the ad hominums.

  • windbourne

    Prior to my marrying, when I had multiple backgrounds with genetics, virology, computer science, etc. I would have been very happy going to mars. Even if I KNEW that I would die within 10 years of landing, it would be worth it to see another planet and to help move mankind into the future.

    Now, I am much too old, have wife and kids, so no. I would not apply. BUT, many many others will. Heck, look at Mars one. Most of those that applied actually think that Mars one is going. And yet, they applied. They WANT TO GO.

    And no, Mars one will NEVER put a single person on Mars.

  • Flatley

    I think trying to predict what will be technologically feasible in 50/100/500 years is not a worthwhile endeavor. We’d do no better than the writers of Back to the Future who envisioned ubiquitous flying cars but could never have even conceived of a concept such as Google Maps.

    It’s more useful to examine human nature in general, and decide whether our actions in the past indicate we are species which is content to sit idly where we are. This is obviously not the case.

    I think the only thing that will prevent humans from living permanently off of Earth will be a premature nuclear war. That fate avoided, there are no fundamentally compelling reasons that would cause us not to.

  • Terry Rawnsley

    More important than just volunteers is to have the right mix of volunteers. You have to have people with the right skills wanting to go. Right now those skills would primarily be in agriculture and supportive manufacturing. You need food before mines and you need mines before you can have manufacturing. The problem with colonizing Mars would be that initially you need to plant a small yet almost fully-formed civilization on the planet at the outset with enough stores to sustain it for years before it would ever have the capability of becoming self-sustaining.

  • Terry Rawnsley

    Is “Bayliner” the name of the company that makes it or is it the name of the boat itself?

  • Terry Rawnsley

    I remember when most of these comments were just poking fun at the name.