Orbital Sues ULA Over RD-180 Engine, Asks for at Least $515 Million

The Orbital Sciences Corporation Antares rocket is seen as it launches from Pad-0A of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS) at the NASA Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia, Sunday, April 21, 2013. The test launch marked the first flight of Antares and the first rocket launch from Pad-0A. The Antares rocket delivered the equivalent mass of a spacecraft, a so-called mass simulated payload, into Earth's orbit. Photo (Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls)

The Orbital Sciences Corporation Antares rocket on its maiden launch on April 21, 2013. (Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls)

Orbital Sciences Corporation has sued ULA seeking damages of between $515 million to $1.5 billion for blocking sales of the Russian-built RD-180 that Orbital wants to use in its Antares launch vehicle, Space News reports.

Orbital of Dulles, Va., claims Denver-based ULA has not only illegally prevented open-market sale of the RD-180, but also has monopolized the launch-services market for certain satellites in violation of U.S. antitrust laws, according to a complaint filed June 20 with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Alexandria.

Orbital wants a federal judge to strike down an exclusivity agreement ULA has with its engine supplier, RD AMROSS, and to force ULA to pay Orbital at least $515 million — and potentially more than $1.5 billion — for damages arising from ULA’s alleged monopolization of “launch systems and services used for medium-class payload missions,” according to court papers. Orbital wants the case to go before a jury.

The suit marks an escalation in Orbital’s spat with ULA over the Russian-made RD-180 engine, which is imported to the United States. by a company called RD AMROSS, a joint venture of United Technologies Corp. of Hartford, Conn., and NPO Energomash of Moscow, which manufactures the engine. United Technologies Corp.’s recently divested rocket propulsion division is the original U.S. partner in RD AMROSS, but the joint venture has not yet conveyed as part of that transaction….

Because of an exclusivity agreement forged decades ago with Lockheed Martin, one of ULA’s two parent companies along with Boeing Co., RD AMROSS is only permitted to sell the RD-180 to ULA. Lockheed Martin, which needed a main engine for its new line of Atlas rockets, helped fund the RD-180’s development.

Orbital is currently using 40-year old AJ-26 (a.k.a., NK-33) engines left over from the Soviet Union’s abandoned 1970′s effort to send cosmonauts to the moon. Aerojet Rocketdyne has been refurbishing the engines for use on Antares.

Orbital is concerned about the limited supply of the engines as well as corrosion that has occurred over the past four decades. Aerojet Rocketdyne says it has an agreement with a Russian company to restart production on the engines if Orbital will sign a contract to do so.

11 Responses to “Orbital Sues ULA Over RD-180 Engine, Asks for at Least $515 Million”

  1. 1 Nadir Bagaveyev

    Squabbling for Russian engines is funny

  2. 2 Nickolai

    I wonder if they could get around some of the legalities by just setting up a parallel company to RD AMROSS, since it seems they’re the ones bound by the exclusivity agreement.

  3. 3 Brainard

    I would love to purchase some of your high performance staged combustion engines, can you tell me where I might find them? Thanks in advance.

  4. 4 Nadir Bagaveyev

    How much thrust you need?

  5. 5 Brainard

    If you’ve got a low thrust, high thrust to weight ratio, low weight closed cycle, staged combustion engine burning liquid methane, that would be perfect. Preferably something that could purge and start with hydrogen and self pressurize with bleed gases tapped off in an appropriate location and not using any helium pressurant as well too. Throttling capabilities to 50% or less would help a lot also. Thanks in advance. Lol.

  6. 6 Nadir Bagaveyev

    Come to Mojave, I have 7500 lbf LOX/methane engine just for you, comrade.

  7. 7 Brainard

    At that thrust level I’m going to need quite a few of them.

    Do you accept MasterCard?

  8. 8 disqus_wjUQ81ZDum

    The Russian government would have to sign off on it. Probably not.

  9. 9 Nickolai

    What problem would the Russian government have with selling more engines?

  10. 10 Supermeerkat

    The RD-180 is one the finest, most reliable and most powerful rocket engine ever built. In this day and age, it’s easier to buy an off the shelf model than to build one from scratch.

  11. 11 disqus_wjUQ81ZDum

    Not selling, establishing another joint venture. Given today’s climate, they could string it out on the ITAR issues alone. Also, Orbital has those concerns about the age of the NK-33 engines.

Leave a Reply