Skylon Update: Big Bucks, Buck Rogers

13 Comments

During a plenary session at the International Astronautic Federation conference in Naples on Wednesday, Reaction Engines Founding Director Alan Bond said that the Skylon space plane could be commercially operational in 2022 after a development program that would cost about $14 billion. Flights of the reusable, single-stage-to-orbit vehicle would cost roughly $5 million each.

None of that is really news to anyone who has been following the program. However, what Bond said about the technical progress on the Skylon’s advanced propulsion system was intriguing, providing hope to supporters that the company might find the financial backing it needs to carry the program to completion.

During the presentation, Bond said the following [emphasis mine]:

“Skylon is progressing. We’ve gone through several design iterations and we’re currently working on what we think is the version that will get built. We’ve been doing a very great deal of work on the actual propulsion side of the vehicle. Obviously, a vehicle like Skylon, it’s the propulsion that is really the ground-breaking technology, and that has gone extremely well. During the course of this past year, we’ve actually moved to the point of, we’ve know we’ve been able to make heat exchangers, if any of you understand the way the Skylon engines operate, we cool the air in an air-breathing engine to Mach 5, thereafter we transfer to rocket propulsion effectively to go to orbit. But, the bit up to Mach 5 is the important part.

“We’ve demonstrated over a year ago that we could make those components and now we have them on test and they are demonstrating they actually perform as they would be expect to perform. That program is, I’ve got to confess, running a bit late. Anyone here who’s been mixed up in development programs know all of those issues, and how much sleep we lose over getting everything to work properly. I’m pleased to say that we’re fairly close to the end of this particular demonstration program.

“So, the indications are that, contrary to many views, single stage vehicles which look like aerospace are possible to fly to orbit and return and then a couple of days later to do the job again. I believe that we are now within months, not years, of actually proving that to the world absolutely. And so the question is, what is the world going to do about that?

Reaction Engines is open to business to talk, particularly in Europe, but also elsewhere to the United States and so on, with regard to how we’re going to push that technology forward. My view is that Skylon, and that’s only a name for a particular type of this vehicle, will change the future. It is, as far as we can see, the Buck Rogers space plane. It takes off, it goes into orbit, it does its job, it returns and then can do it again, 200 times. We have easy reason now to believe that that’s is feasible. So, we’re talking to various companies within Europe, within the United States. Silvio [Sandrone] alluded to certain legislation issues and protectionist views of our technology. I think that if we’re to make real progress, we’ve got to get over those issues. So, Skylon is making progress.

This is intriguing because the main knock against Skylon has always been its large price tag and long development schedule. But, if Reaction Engines has a Mach 5 propulsion system that actually works, that could change the calculus significantly. That’s essentially what Bond is saying here.

It will be interesting to see what develops in the future.

Be Sociable, Share!
  • usk0

    This is a delusional dream, but this is the internet – so, what the hell:

    Instead of financing Ariane 6, maybe throw some cash at this? Come on, you know you want to.

  • ReusablesFoever

    Congratulations are in order to Reaction Engines for an apparently successful demonstration of their air cooling system for the SABRE engine. SSTO may still be a way in the future but what a first stage of a two-stage system that engine would make!! In my opinion, it would be a real game-changer – namely, one propulsion system for the entire flight.

  • ELKERN

    Well, they’re sure as hell going a lot further than Virgin Galactic and XCOR. LOL

  • Geoff T

    It’s a sad state when it still seems like a pipedream that a country that commands the second largest aerospace industry in the world can undertake a project as ambitious as Skylon. Considering the way the British government spends money on far less ambitious schemes with far greater projected costs which do little to add to industry and the national economy.

    If Skylons engines work and it has passed all of ESA’s feasibility tests, the UK should certainly position itself to claim a large share of Europe’s launcher capacity. Or at least it would do in my ideal world, *sigh*.

  • Anon

    Doug, this is not worth covering.

  • Phil

    YES! Looking forward to see a working prototype….

  • http://www.parabolicarc.com Doug Messier

    Anon:

    Why do you say that? Is it because:

    1. The technology won’t work?
    2. They won’t get the funding they need?
    3. A giant super volcano will suddenly explode at Stonehenge and bury Britain under 50 feet of ash, pumice and volcanic magma?

    I’m guessing it’s probably one of those first two, but I think that last one would make one kick ass disaster movie.

  • http://www.youtube.com/user/tonyewhitehead Tony Whitehead

    This is an exciting time to follow the entire space industry. I was going to comment more fully about this article, Doug, but your answer to Anon is difficult to top. Well played,sir! Enjoy following your articles.

  • http://www.microeyeinteractive.com Richard Beddek

    Tony’s statement is correct. It certainly is an exciting time to follow the space industry. As a young, wide-eyed kid, growing up in the ’60s and ’70s, space travel was the stuff of my dreams. Now, middle-aged, my dreams have been rekindled.

    I came across Parabolic Arc about a year ago(thankyou!). The first thing I do when I get to my desk each morning is to check the lastest report, success story or failure. What amazes me are the numder of companies and organisations involved in this industry…. my Favourites sidebar must have 250-300 so far.

    This industry is alive and well! It really is a great time to see each and every one of these companies strive to reach their goals… and dreams.

  • alex wilson

    I remember reading about this technology several years ago and thinking that it had potential. not having to carry oxidizer on a vehicle to accelerate it to Mach 5 would be a major weight savings, and whether it can or can’t be part of an SSTO vehicle, development definitely should continue. hopefully they’ll find someone with deep pockets to help them take this concept into flight testing.

  • Greg Holden

    I hope to god the UK government put just a bit of cash into this exciting project, if only to encourage other investors… Thanks for the update (as ever) Doug!

  • A Theisen

    “They” said going faster than 12 miles an hour in a horseless carriage would shake the human body to death. “They” said man was never intended to fly. “They” said the sound barrier was absolute. My own Father (born in 1897) said that if men went into space, God would destroy the Earth. “They” said . . . well you fill in the rest.

  • Anonymous

    We can only hope that someone in the UK government has the vision to fund this. But given how they seem more than happy to flog off BAE to the Germans and French, I fear that our current Government hasn’t the vision to fund such a ambitious project that could turn RR into the Boeing of the space industry and give the UK dominance in space transportation for decades, why other countries wastes tens of billions pursuing pork barrel projects such as the Senate launch systems and Arian 6 both will probably end up costing double their estimated budget.

    The UK could easily divert just a fraction QE money into this, the banks have already had more than their fair share.