Will SpaceShipTwo Delays Tarnish Branson, Virgin Brand?

Comments

(Credit: David Wilson, Spaceport America)

By Douglas Messier
Parabolic Arc Managing Editor

Some of the 500 people who have signed up to fly into space aboard Richard Branson’s SpaceShipTwo are getting a little impatient with the brash British billionaire’s failure to deliver flights after seven-and-a-half years of development:

But not all of the investors keen to fly to the final frontier on this Star Trek dream are happy with the way they are being treated. Lebanese technology tycoon Bassim Haidar, who paid US$200,000 six years ago for his ticket, is frustrated at Galactic’s reluctance to give a date for the flight.

At his home in Surrey multi-millionaire Bassim tells me: “I wanted to be the first Arab in space, so I signed up right away. But I can’t get Branson to say when we will fly. I’m very disappointed in him. He’s not the ‘can-do businessman’ he likes to project to the media.

“I’ve been in touch with other customers and we all feel the same way. All we get are emails advertising holidays to his hotel in Morocco or his game reserve in South Africa. We feel that we are being used as potential customers for his other businesses.

I’m not interested in his role as a travel agent. I just want him to take me to space.”

Bassim is only the second person to go public with his frustrations over the schedule delays. One client got his money back last year. However, his comments indicate that the frustrations have become more widespread, although the extent of the grumbling is difficult to guage.

Bassim is right that Virgin has been cross-selling its other properties and services to would-be millionauts since the beginning of Virgin’s space program. The company has also said that clients aren’t just buying tickets but entry into an exclusive club of fellow movers and shakers and access to exclusive events.

SpaceSpaceTwo has also become an integral part of the Virgin brand and Branson’s image as a risk-taking, high-tech innovator. Behold, the  latest Virgin Mobile commercial:

This is good stuff. Flying in space via special effects. All bucks, no Buck Rogers.

So, when will Virgin Galactic actually be flying commercially? Last year, Branson said that he hoped to take the first commercial flight with his family by Christmas 2012. However, it is already April and SpaceShipTwo has not had a single powered flight, so that expectation doesn’t look very realistic at this point. (Which is par for the course with Branson.) CEO and President George Whitesides has been recently quoted as predicting powered flight this summer.

The last time I saw Virgin Galactic officials talk about SpaceShipTwo was at the Next-generation Suborbital Researchers Conference at the end of February. They were not giving any dates, stressing they would fly the vehicle when it was ready and safe.

I’m hearing conflicting stories. Some people say that powered flights are on schedule; others say that there are still engine issues. We should know soon.

At present, some disgruntled millionaires upset because their flights to space have been delayed is probably a fairly minor issue for Virgin Galactic. Branson and his team know how to sooth angry customers. And there are no competitors out there that are likely to fly before 2014.

But, the window is narrowing. The company has to show some major progress on powered flights this year that will allow it to put forth a credible estimate for the start of commercial service. If that doesn’t happen, they’re going to have a lot of explaining to do.

October 4 will mark the the eighth anniversary of the last flight of SpaceShipOne and the beginning of the SpaceShipTwo program. Two weeks later, the International Symposium for Personal and Commercial Spaceflight (ISPCS) will be held in Las Cruces. Virgin used the last two symposiums to dedicate the runway and the hangar facility out at Spaceport America. One wonder what they have in mind this year. I guess they can give tours of the hangar, which should be nearly complete by that point.

However, if they’re not flying under power by then, any event they plan would probably seem rather hallow. And the periodic complaints about the delays could become a cacophony that will widen far beyond a handful of annoyed millionaires. New Mexico taxpayers might start to seriously question why they spent $209 million on the spaceport, joining the relative handful of residents who have spoken out already.

That would be a much better story for the media because it involves the expenditure of public funding. This venture is such a novelty (Ashton in Spaaaaacee!) and affects so few people that almost nobody in the press really cares when the flights actually take place or how far off Branson has been in all of his predictions.  But, once public criticism of how government has spent an enormous amount of money reaches a critical mass, the media start paying much closer attention.

The other major issue will come to the forefront once XCOR begins Lynx test flights, which could occur in December. The vehicle will finally be real, and more would-be millionauts will begin to give Lynx flights much more serious consideration. XCOR, with its much cheaper cost and “Right Stuff” experience, might even draw some customers away from Virgin Galactic if delays continue for SpaceShipTwo.

Virgin Galactic has been a big positive for Branson and the Virgin Group. However, the longer the delays go on and the louder the complaints become, the greater the potential for space tourism to become a black mark on Branson’s reputation as an innovative, can-do tech leader. The next six months will tell.

Be Sociable, Share!
  • http://www.anom.net Anom

    Doug,

    Good post.

    It is interesting to note that the aerodynamics of the SS2 fuselage (remember that SS2 had that stall and needs to be modified), the spaceport, the spaceport’s hangar, and many other things at VG are not ready yet. This is on top of the SS2 engine not being ready yet.

    It looks like VG has had major delays in everything important except for the performance of WK2 (which is the easiest challenge).

    Scaled Composites is a 1-off prototype shop for X-aircraft that are not used for routine flights of passengers, so it should not be a surprise that VG would have these delays.

    Eclipse Aviation and a lot of air-taxi companies went bankrupt when they attempted to manufacture a Scaled Composites design and build airport infrastructure around this design. Some people like to blame these failures solely on delays and unsuitability of the aircraft engine (from Williams Inc) that was supposed to power this Scaled Composites air frame, but these people faced the same symphony of failures that VG is facing now.

    This is a lot harder than it looks, so it is unlikely that XCOR, Blue Origin, Armadillo, or others are going to be flying sub-orbital passengers any time soon as well. You might be right in guessing 2014.

    VG will be well rewarded when it sticks it out and makes it to the finish line. VG will not have have any true competitors, and its market will grow when it proves its product.

  • Geoff T

    I’d hate to break it to Bassim Haidar, but Saudi astronauts flew on the Shuttle in the mid 80′s (namely: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultan_bin_Salman_bin_Abdul-Aziz_Al_Saud).

    As for Branson, sure he’s been wildly overenthusiastic promoting Virgin Galactic here, but he’s still the man to beat here. SpaceShipTwo has been undergoing glide tests for almost a year now, XCOR’s Lynx is still a CGI mockup as far as the public is concerned. If rocket engine tests for SS2 actually start this year I can imagine most complaints will fizzle out relatively quickly.

  • Jason

    Lynx’s fuselage has been delivered and its engines have been tested extensively.

  • http://www.parabolicarc.com Doug Messier

    The conventional wisdom on SpaceShipTwo is roughly this:

    1. Scaled made a mistake by designing the spacecraft before the engine, which is doing things in reverse.
    2,. The hybid engine used for SpaceShipOne has been proven difficult to scale up.
    3. Replacing it with a liquid engine would be expensive and likely require significant changes to the spacecraft.
    4. If it changed engines, VG would have to throw out all that material on its website about the superior safety of hybrid engines (which many experts think is a dubious claim anyway).

    XCOR developed the engines over a dozen years and is now building a spacecraft around it. That’s a first for them, so we’ll see how they do on it.

  • Ratliff

    The X-15 first flight was its last planned glide flight. On the second X-15 flight, it went Mach 2.11. I think this says a lot about the depth of engineering and testing done before X-15 even flew.

  • http://www.parabolicarc.com Doug Messier

    It certainly tells you a great deal about the engine work. The X-15 was first fitted with two X-1 engines because the large engine they planned to use was not yet ready. It worked perfectly well, allowing them to explore the flight envelope at lower speeds and altitudes.

    The fact that the X-15 was the latest in a series of X aircraft stretching back over a decade also gave them a lot of confidence in what they were doing.

    The contrast is sharp. SpaceShipOne had 17 flights, only six of them under power and three into space. It was then summarily retired far short of being to full explore either the flight envelope or the use of hybrid engines.

    They then proceeded to build a new system that is three times larger than the original one using a hybrid engine that has been very difficult to scale up. Scaled apparently also doesn’t use wind tunnels during design phase.

    They now have to reclear the flight envelope as a result of a near disastrous flight last September and design changes in the vehicle. Meanwhile, there have been all of 14 hot firings of the engine during the past 8 years.

  • Carolynne

    An international group of engineers, with decades of combined experience in rocket-motor development, including Nitrous Oxide Hybrids, have recently obtained the investigation report on the fatal accident at the Scaled Composites test site. A serious analysis of the information therein, gives cause for grave concern.

    This report is now in the public domain and we are happy to make it available to any interested party. Then you can all make up you own minds about the safety claims.

  • Ratliff

    Research published in 1935 by T. Carlton-Sutton, H.R. Ambler and G. Wyn Williams on the thermochemical properties of nitrous oxide measured the conditions under which nitrous oxide gas can undergo explosive thermal decomposition. These properties are inherent in nitrous oxide and independent of materials compatibility.