NASA Details Commercial Crew Strategy

Comments


NASA held a Commercial Crew session this morning that featured Program Manager Ed Mango and his deputy, Brent Jett. I’ve included some key slides from the presentation along with notes that I took. Above is the schedule, which would have crewed flights to the International Space Station by FY 2017.

Although neither Mango nor Jett would discuss NASA’s FY 2013 budget request for commercial crew, they expressed confidence that funding would be sufficient to ensure genuine competition.

“We are confident that we can award multiple awards in that range during the base period,” Jett said.

There overlapping periods on the schedule labeled “Optional Milestones” and “NASA Certification.” Mango said this approach gives the program flexibility to deal with uncertainty over funding. Jett added that if certification funding is delayed beyond FY 2014, the companies can keep moving forward under optional milestones.

Mango said that safety requirements have been published and are “out on the street.” NASA is looking at certification as a multi-part process. First, it wants to see how industry is proposing to analyze, understand and reduce risks. Then there is a NASA process.

NASA is looking at two approaches to certifiction: DETC (development, testing, evaluation and certification); and a “certification” concept with a reduced scope. Jett said the space agency had planned to go with DETC, but it is evaluating that option.

Jett said that understanding how a company analyzes and reduces risk will tell NASA a lot about the safety culture there. The company needs to be strong in having a healthy tension, strong internal checks and balances, and value-added independent review, he said.

 

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!
  • JohnHunt

    Boy, give full years from when SpaceX delivers cargo to the ISS until, they are allowed to let it deliver crew? Isn’t that a long time? Would SpaceX be prevented from placing one of its own crew on board well before five years?

  • Andy

    “Would SpaceX be prevented from placing one of its own crew on board well before five years?”

    This is a good question and I’d also like to know the answer. In general, I would like to know how human rating and manned flight testing of commercial space craft will work.

    How does testing of a new military or commercial aircraft work? For the F-35, for example, is the first person to fly it a pilot on the Lockheed Martin payroll or is it an active duty Air Force or Navy pilot? I know the test pilot of Sikorsky’s X2 was a Sikorsky test pilot.

    Regardless of the policy, I imagine the loss of Ken Bowersox has not helped that situation.

  • warshawski

    The only objective SpaceX is missing is the pad abort test, with progress to date I would be expecting SpaceX to be ready for a manned Launch 2014 providing they get funding of course. The hurdle will be integration of the Super Draco abort thrusters into Dragon and integration testing. This requires not only software testing but hardware to be built and tested which costs significant amounts of money and the more testing the better which means more money. Considering MPCV is getting over $400M for a single un-manned test flight funding should be increased for comercial crew testing.

  • JohnHunt

    I know that NASA has paid SpaceX about $400 million shoo far and has got a Falcon 9 and Dragon capsule for that. Anyone know how much more they expect to spend for being able to get rockets that can carry people to the ISS?

  • http://secondscripter.com John Laury

    @JohnHunt Yeah, they’ve already spent it. $75 million was given to SpaceX to finish off the development of the escape system, the last system needed on Dragon to get it man rated.