<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solaren: Powering the World With Sunlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parabolicarc.com/2009/04/16/solaren-powering-world-sunlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parabolicarc.com/2009/04/16/solaren-powering-world-sunlight/</link>
	<description>Space Tourism ... and Much More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:01:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.parabolicarc.com/2009/04/16/solaren-powering-world-sunlight/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parabolicarc.com/?p=3468#comment-997</guid>
		<description>Talk about doublethink!  They want us to believe that burning fossil fuels is causing global warming so we switch to solar, wind, geothermal, etc.  People’s perception of capturing solar energy for electricity production is squeaky clean.  So how could solar panels in space be any different?  Well I’ll tell you.

Solar energy is being diverted to the earth that would normally pass it by.

This idea certainly would cause man made global warming since the earth would be receiving more solar energy than it would naturally.  It doesn’t matter that it’s being converted to radio waves for transmission.  Energy is energy.  It cannot be created or destroyed.  Once that extra energy is here on earth, it’s up to the earth to rid itself of it.  There’s no debating that this idea would cause man made global warming.

There are already sufficient amounts of solar energy hitting the earth’s surface that we can harness.  What we need to work on is better energy storage.  There exists today upper and lower reservoirs where water is pumped up when demand is low, and allowed to flow down to produce electricity when the demand is high.

We need smaller residential type systems so that the stored energy is close to the consumer, reducing the need for transmission lines over long distances.  I don’t like the idea of conventional batteries because you have to dispose of them when they die.  A system of electrolyzing water, storage and fuel cell would be more desirable.

I really hope this idea gets shut down before any large amounts of money are wasted on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about doublethink!  They want us to believe that burning fossil fuels is causing global warming so we switch to solar, wind, geothermal, etc.  People’s perception of capturing solar energy for electricity production is squeaky clean.  So how could solar panels in space be any different?  Well I’ll tell you.</p>
<p>Solar energy is being diverted to the earth that would normally pass it by.</p>
<p>This idea certainly would cause man made global warming since the earth would be receiving more solar energy than it would naturally.  It doesn’t matter that it’s being converted to radio waves for transmission.  Energy is energy.  It cannot be created or destroyed.  Once that extra energy is here on earth, it’s up to the earth to rid itself of it.  There’s no debating that this idea would cause man made global warming.</p>
<p>There are already sufficient amounts of solar energy hitting the earth’s surface that we can harness.  What we need to work on is better energy storage.  There exists today upper and lower reservoirs where water is pumped up when demand is low, and allowed to flow down to produce electricity when the demand is high.</p>
<p>We need smaller residential type systems so that the stored energy is close to the consumer, reducing the need for transmission lines over long distances.  I don’t like the idea of conventional batteries because you have to dispose of them when they die.  A system of electrolyzing water, storage and fuel cell would be more desirable.</p>
<p>I really hope this idea gets shut down before any large amounts of money are wasted on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
